Audio-Technica AT-LP5X Direct-Drive Turntable In-Depth Review

I never featured the Audio-Technica AT-Lp5, though I’ve corresponded with several readers who own them. Since its 2016 launch, it gained rapid traction and cemented its place as a budget favourite, essentially taking the direct drive motor from a line of popular DJ turntables and giving it a more audiophile-friendly aesthetic and feature set, along with a slightly inflated price, to appease those who feel having a pitch control or the traditional rectangular start button on their turntable may somehow compromise its performance. The LP5 was recently superseded by the AT-LP5X, and with one now sitting atop my rack, it’s time to take a look. Thanks to IPT (Improved Performance Turntables) and The Audio Files for helping to make this review possible.

At Lp5x Top

The LP5X is a ‘super OEM’ turntable built upon a standard platform by the Chinese outfit Hanpin, though Audio-Technica appear to have a great deal more input into their designs than other manufacturers who choose to base their decks upon similar platforms; Pioneer, Sony and Reloop to name just a few.

The Arm

Perhaps the most obvious nod to AT’s heritage on display here is the j-shaped tonearm, a design harking back to Audio-Technica and SME arms of the 60s. The shape of the arm tube improves tracking performance with a shorter overall pipe length for equivalent overhang, lower mass, higher rigidity and reduced resonance. The arm rides on a gimbal bearing, terminating at the opposite end in an SME-style headshell mount.

The arm bearing is said to have received a few tweaks in this latest model. It’s made of metal where it counts, and I found no perceptible play in my factory-fresh example. It floats smoothly, swinging freely in all directions and appears to be of excellent quality given the modest cost of the turntable as a whole.

Hanpin decks are known for weak anti-skate, some to the point where the anti-skating force is virtually nonexistent. This wasn’t the case with the deck I have. Floating the arm and increasing the anti-skate compensation produced a gradual increase in force pushing toward the armrest as one would expect. With tracking force at 2 grams and the anti-skating force set accordingly, the cartridge tracked perfectly with equal channel balance and the stylus remained parallel with the cartridge body across a 12” disc.

Perhaps this is a fluke, or perhaps given that this was a wide-spread issue on Audio-Technica’s AT-LP120 among others, they have finally found a resolution. AT do offer a replacement spring assembly for the AT-LP120 which is said to correct this problem, so it would seem that the issue has finally been nipped in the bud.

Accompanying the arm are typical cueing and anti-skate controls, though no VTA adjustment as on more DJ-oriented decks. A small degree of azimuth adjustment can be achieved using the headshell mount, which should be plenty for most cartridges.

The effective mass with the included HS-6 headshell is right around 16 grams so the arm should be considered as an arm of moderate mass when calculating resonance frequency and cartridge choice, though most cartridges of moderate-high to low compliance, including moving coil designs should work just fine. Tonearm/cartridge resonance for the AT-LP5X is 9.56Hz, right around the 10Hz ideal figure. This is quoted using an effective mass of 16 grams, and dynamic compliance of 12.25 x 6 cm/dyne at 10Hz. The official specification is given as 7 x 6 cm/dyne but at 100Hz, which is multiplied by 1.75 to give a figure close enough to be used in a 10Hz calculation.

The arm has an effective length of 247 mm (9.72 inches) with a specified 17 mm overhang. It appears to closely follow the Bearwald or Lofgren A alignment standard, though with custom null points of 66.2 and 122.4 mm. Quoted maximum tracking adjustment is 0 to 4 grams with an applicable cartridge weight range, including the headshell, of 15 to 20 grams using the included counterweight.

The Cartridge

The LP5 included a printed protractor in the box but that is absent here. It can be downloaded, or you can use a Technics 52 mm overhang gauge available cheaply online

The LP5X ships with a lightweight (9 grams) HS-6 headshell and pre-mounted VM95E cartridge. The VM95 is an upgrade on the aT95XE as supplied with the LP5, which itself was an AT95E with slightly tweaked damping. The Vm95E is an excellent cartridge in its own right, but also provides an easy upgrade path. The VM95 range includes a selection of replaceable styli (Conical, Elliptical, Nude Elliptical, MicroLine and Shibata) which are all interchangeable using the same cartridge body. This means that owners of an LP5X can enjoy a significant sonic upgrade without the need to fuss with cartridge alignment by simply snapping a new stylus assembly into place. It’s also possible to purchase a suitable stylus for playing back 78RPM Shellac discs, advantageous given that the LP5X adds a selection for the 78RPM speed.

At Lp5x Cartridge

The Motor

Supplied too are a hinged dust cover, a nicely machined aluminium 45 adapter and the lightweight cast aluminium platter with a thick 5 mm rubber mat, which effectively dampens the ring of the thin aluminium. The platter sits atop a tapered spindle, beneath which is the single rotor of the direct-drive motor. The motor is An 8-pole, 3-phase brushless design with quartz speed control and electronic braking, achieved as in most direct-drive turntables by a quick backward spin of the platter for half an RPM or so. Starting torque is 1KGF/CM, down from the 1.6KGF/CM of the previous model, with no running torque figure given.

Quoted motor specifications are -50dB SNR and 0.2% wow and flutter (wRMS, 33RPM, 3kHz). These are nothing remarkable on paper for a direct drive and certainly won’t put a Technics to shame, though do add up to decent performance; the proof is in the pudding as they say. Speed is accurate and there’s enough running torque to account for stylus drag. The motor whips the platter up to speed quickly with a slight growl as it locks onto the correct speed. Once things have stabilised there is no audible motor noise on 33 or 45, though I noticed a faint chugging on 78 which suggests the deck was struggling to hold precise speed. This could be due to a number of factors. The most unlikely of which is that the motor has been simplified (read weakened) over the previous model, and may struggle to maintain such a high RPM. It could also be that the servos are not able to react quickly enough to the outputs from the motor to maintain an accurate lock on speed. Or, as the platter lacks mass around the periphery, it may thus lack the required inertia for the drive system to maintain the higher speed without assistance.

Power And Preamp

Gone is the internal power supply and hefty transformer of the LP5, a bid to reduce mechanical noise and electro-magnetic interference with the side effect of lightening the deck by a surprising degree. The power supply is now a switch-mode ‘wall wart’, provided with UK and EU adapters and connecting to a standard barrel connector at the rear of the turntable via a cable of approximately 1.5 metres in length. Accompanying which are the USB output, RCA outputs and a ground terminal. A 1.9 metre USB cable and 1 metre RCA cable with ground lead are provided in the box.

A pair of switches toggle the internal preamp on and off and switch between moving magnet or moving coil operation. The 16-bit resolution USB output natively supports sampling rates of 44.1 or 48kHz. There’s no high-res DSD support, not that you need it when you’re digitising records.

At Lp5x Rear

Output level with the preamp engaged is a nominal 250MV at 1kHz, 5CM/sec. Moving magnet preamp gain is 36dB nominal and 56dB nominal for MC. These are pretty ‘safe’ figures which should accommodate most cartridges just fine, though if you opted for a low output moving coil you might find things a little too quiet, or too noisy once you turn up the volume to an appreciable level.

Setup and Sound

Setup is as simple as levelling the plinth, setting the platter and mat into place, and balancing the tonearm. If you’re new to this, the Audio-Technica manual gives comprehensive instructions which (spelling mistakes aside) should be easy to follow. I noted a slight imbalance between platter and plinth indicating that something isn’t quite running true or more likely due to tolerances in the platter casting, but it’s within acceptable limits and didn’t cause an issue. I simply set the deck up with the platter level and grabbed a pile of records.

The sound is big, bold and full of ‘oomf’. The solid bottom end, a hallmark of a direct drive is accounted for, extending up through the mids into a sweet if somewhat bright top end. Motor noise is not at all obtrusive, and I couldn’t detect any variation in speed during sustained passages. Backgrounds are quiet allowing excellent insight into the subtle details of a recording, and it’s more than adept at demonstrating the advantages of a well-pressed disc.

I was especially impressed by how well the arm paired with the VM95 cartridge. The end of side distortion inevitable with an elliptical stylus profile is suppressed to a degree where the cart easily tracks upper frequencies cleanly at the end of a side on all but the loudest passages. Whether this is down to the chosen geometry, the point of resonance of the arm/cartridge combination or both I am unsure. But it must be said that this is an excellent demonstration of what the VM95 is capable of, even with one of the better styli mounted, where things clean up still further and the sound opens up in a very pleasing way.

And the phono stage also is superb. I remember a time when the integrated phono stages in Super OEM turntables were horrific sounding things. They were dull as dishwater, suppressed any attempt at dynamics and brought a din of their own to the performance. Things have vastly improved with the LP5 and the LP5X. Besides a very slight hum, only noticeable at high volume, the phono stage is quiet with excellent sound staging, great dynamic range and a clean, crisp sound without a hint of overload. Switching the gain to MC does produce more noise, but it’s acceptable and akin to what you might expect from a budget outboard unit up to a hundred pounds or so. To have this included ‘in the box’ as it were is another tick to the LP5X’s pros list.

The one area where the LP5 suffers is in plinth resonance, which manifests in a blurring effect at on the lowest bass notes and heavy backbeats. Tapping on the plinth with the cartridge sitting on a stationary record produces a dull ringing sound, suggesting that vibrations transmitted between the arm mount and plinth are the culprit as opposed to adverse resonance in the arm. Neither are especially rigid, and neither is much thought given to rigidity in the coupling of the arm to the main bearing.

While this is a shortfall of the design, it’s only noticeable if you compare the LP5X against pricier rivals and better damped direct-drive designs, the likes of the Technics SL-1500 or Reloop Turn 5 for example. In isolation and normal listening it’s not a glaring issue and doesn’t detract from the performance given by the LP5X, which is excellent especially given the relatively modest price. Speed stability is spot on. Background noise is low. And the VM95E cartridge and the LP5X arm track wonderfully and are a great pairing, which is more than can be said for a couple of its big-name belt drive rivals.

At Lp5x Front


For those looking to play records to a high standard with minimal fuss and an easy upgrade path, the LP5X is hard to fault. For those keen to fettle, the LP5X offers plenty of scope for cartridge swapping and has a lot of modding potential, something that I will likely explore in future publications.

The AT-LP5X is not the be-all and end-all direct drive deck. But it looks perfectly respectable, sounds great and can be upgraded along the way. As a first step into high-end vinyl playback, a turntable to resurrect a long-forgotten collection, an easy means of digitising your records or an upgrade from your first turntable, the AT-LP5X is great value for money. Highly recommended.

By Ashley

I founded Audio Appraisal a few years ago and continue to regularly update it with fresh content. An avid vinyl collector and coffee addict, I can often be found at a workbench tinkering with a faulty electronic device, tweaking a turntable to extract the last bit of detail from those tiny grooves in the plastic stuff, or relaxing in front of the hi-fi with a good album. A musician, occasional producer and sound engineer, other hobbies include software programming, web development, long walks and occasional DIY. Follow @ashleycox2


  1. Hello, I own the AT-LP5X and find it wanting. Something is missing in the sound. I played my copy of Switched on Brandenberg #3, and it sounds two dimensional. I’m thinking a new cartridge or as you mention, stylus, could help broaden the sound. Any recommendations? My local newspaper mentioned that the Goldring E3 is a good modestly priced cartridge that would work with my tonearm.

    1. The Goldring E3 is just a re-styled, rebranded and overpriced AT VM95. I’d look at the AT-VMN95ML stylus for your existing cartridge, or consider a VM540ML cartridge if budget allows. Audio-Technica do sell the VM540ML pre-mounted to a headshell if you don’t want to deal with the hassle of cartridge alignment. The aforementioned microcline stylus upgrade is a simple clip-in replacement. Make sure to check your tracking force (ideally using a cheaply available digital tracking force scale) and ensure the anti-skate is set to match.

    2. I believe that 85-90% of turntables sound is the cartridge, try the Nagaoka MP-110 cartridge with the Schiit Mani phono stage, it will transform the sound of your LP5x.

      1. I’d say it’s more like 50%. The quality of the bearing and the arm play a huge part. That Nagaoka has an elliptical bonded stylus, just like the VM95E. I personally think no cartridge above £100 should be fitted with an elliptical stylus, as a high percentage of cartridge performance is down to the stylus and cantilever. The VM95ML stylus upgrade has the Microline stylus, which is one of the best profiles available, and is significantly cheaper. It would, especially given the quality of AT’s moving magnet generator, better the Nagaoka and similarly priced options from Sumiko, Ortofon et al by a country mile.

  2. Hello Ashley,
    Thanks for the excellent and very detailed review. After reading it, i’m seriously considering to buy it.
    I just have a ( stupid ) doubt and I hope you can help me once i don’t have enough knowledge about the subject. I have an Ortofon concorde with a stylus 20. I like it a lot, it’s simple to use and sounds very nice,i would definitely love to keep it. Do you know if an Ortofon Concorde is compatible with the AT-lp5x J- shaped tonearm?

    1. Unfortunately the alignment of the Concorde is fixed, and is not preset at an alignment optimal for the AT tonearm. I wouldn’t use it in the LP5X. Personally I would purchase the upgraded VMN95ML MicroLine stylus upgrade and fit it to the included VM95 cartridge. In my opinion it would be a significant improvement over the Concorde on any turntable.

      1. Ashley, thank you very much for your answer. I think I will take your advice, the VMN95ML has very good reviews.

      1. Not available there and I contacted Audio-Technica and they said: “At this time, the AT-LP5x is not available for sale in the US. I am personally hoping it will but nothing has been confirmed yet. You may keep up to date with releases and other Audio-Technica news by signing up for the E-News Letter.”

  3. Ho letto con molto interesse la chiara recensione dato che sono proprietario dell’Audio techica LP5. Il difetto di quest’ultimo l’ho riscontrato nel rumore elettromagnetico che raccoglie la testina di lettura quando arriva in prossimità del centro del disco. E se ho ben capito, separando il trasformatore dal resto del giradischi si dovrebbe ottenere un miglioramento sostanziale.Sarei pertanto orientato all’acquisto del nuovo LP5x e sistemando altrove il vecchio. Un’ultima domanda: il clamp Audiotecnica del peso (eccessivo) di 600 grammi potrebbe creare problemi? Grazie per la cortesia. Giancarlo

    1. Non ho notato alcun rumore vicino al centro del disco con l’Lp5X. Potresti certamente usare un peso record, anche se non lo consiglierei perché non consiglio pesi record in generale. Forse cercane uno più leggero.

  4. Hi Ashley,
    A fair appraisal sir; I’ve been very pleased with my LP5 despite the resonance you mention in the text which I made less troublesome utilising some under-car bonnet sound-deadening sticky-backed padding, some O rings around the tonearm, and more recently a 20mm thick laminated bamboo turntable plinth (read oversize chopping board…) mounted on three sorbothane hemispheres. The main benefit of this type of wood proved to be the tightening up of bass definition to a most pleasing degree. I understand now why such huge prices are charged for the many bamboo hi-fi racks on the market…

      1. Hi Ashley; I wonder if you can shed any light on an LP5 fault which has arisen; perhaps a few of your readers owning this model may have the same problem and would be interested in your thoughts. As you are aware the turntable is not very old.
        Rumble noise has gradually increased over the past month, accompanied by increased woofer flutter. Removing the platter and quickly turning the motor on and off again proved that the motor/spindle was indeed the source, and it even appeared excessive friction may be slowing the spin slightly. Would you kindly share your advice on a possible at-home quick fix, or do you consider it a ‘return to dealer’ situation? Your comments would be greatly appreciated, both by me and any other interested and/or affected owners.

        1. Hi John, that is an unusual problem. I can’t think of a quick fix that wouldn’t require stripping the motor assembly down. If your deck is in warranty and you’d rather go that route then that is what I would recommend. However if you’d like to have a go, my best advice would probably be to clean lubricate the bearing with a synthetic motor oil (not an engine oil) of which small bottles are available on eBay (search turntable oil).

          To do this, remove the platter and then flip the deck over and remove the base of the plinth. The motor circuit board is the largest one in the middle. There are two screws at the circuit board end which you need to remove. Then flip the deck over again. On the metal plate that surrounds the motor spindle, remove the 4 smaller inner-most screws arranged in a square, 97 mm between each if I recall correctly. The motor assembly will then drop out of the plinth. The wires will unplug to make things easier.

          The rotor can then be pulled straight up out of the bearing. It will require a good pull as the magnet keeps it in place. Once you have it out, clean out the bearing with isopropyl alcohol and add a few drops of the aforementioned synthetic oil. Place the rotor back and allow it to sink down into the bearing, giving it a spin and a gentle push to help it. The air will dislodge from the bearing as it goes and the oil will disburse evenly throughout the bearing. Once it’s all the way down give it a spin and make sure it is running silently. If it is, follow the above in reverse order to put the deck back together. If not, lift the rotor out, carefully ad a drop or two of oil and repeat.

          It must be noted for anyone planning to attempt this that this procedure will certainly void the warranty.

          1. Hi Ashley,
            Thank you so much for taking the time to detail the cure for this fault. I must confess that, taking into consideration my arthritic fingers and after studying the procedure, I wasn’t precognitive of its complexity. However, thanks again for your valuable advice, and due to similar reports of a similar fault on the internet, younger and more nimble-fingered LP5/x owners are well advised to file your instructions for possible future use.

            1. I’m sure you could do it if you wanted to, it’s certainly easier than fitting a cart to a headshell. my advice is mainly to prevent users invalidating their warranty. These decks are actually pretty modular and not difficult to strip down at all and new oil does make a notable difference. Ultimately their bearings are not of the highest tolerance so they will never be as quiet as a Technics or one of the better direct drive units but they shouldn’t worsen significantly over time.

              1. Hi Ashley,
                Well there’s a complete surprise! I was idly flicking through my correspondence for a family tree I had when I came across my LP5 invoice. Attached to it was a Richer Sounds 6 year guarantee I’d paid for and completely forgotten about! If Richer won’t honour it (with the alloy turntable now featuring your suggested deadening effect of the neoprene lining ‘upgrade’), I may have to follow your advice after all…
                Fingers crossed.

Share Your Thoughts

Discover more from Audio Appraisal

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading